Miss M Parkinson v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2019] UKET 1800414/2019 (11 July 2019)

Miss M Parkinson v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2019] UKET 1800414/2019 (11 July 2019)

The respondent failed to consult employees as required by law, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Citation
[2019] UKET 1800414/2019
Parties
Claimant: Miss M Parkinson; Respondent: Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
11 July 2019
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim upheld
Legal Topics
Protective Award, Redundancy, Consultation Obligations
Employment Law Protective Award Redundancy Consultation Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Miss M Parkinson

Claimant

Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to consult employees before redundancies as required by law
  2. 2 Entitlement to a protective award

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent failed to consult employees as required by law, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

  • Protective award granted for the maximum period permitted by law