Mr R Diaz v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2020] UKET 1800527/2019 (24 February 2020)

Mr R Diaz v Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration) (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2020] UKET 1800527/2019 (24 February 2020)

The respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Citation
[2020] UKET 1800527/2019
Parties
Claimant: Mr R Diaz; Respondent: Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Protective award granted in favour of claimant
Legal Topics
Protective Award, Collective Redundancies
Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancies

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr R Diaz

Claimant

Harvard Technology Ltd (In Administration)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent failed to comply with its obligations to consult employees prior to redundancy under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992

Ratio Decidendi

The respondent failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy, entitling the claimant to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of claimant

Orders

  • Respondent to pay protective award to claimant