The Institute of Direct and Digital Marketing Training Limited v High Grantham (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19848 (21 March 2018)

The Institute of Direct and Digital Marketing Training Limited v High Grantham (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19848 (21 March 2018)

The complainant established rights in the name or mark, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Transfer of the domain name was ordered.

Citation
[2018] DRS 19848
Parties
Complainant: The Institute of Direct and Digital Marketing Training Limited; Respondent: High Grantham
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
21 March 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Passing Off, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Passing Off Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

The Institute of Direct and Digital Marketing Training Limited

Complainant

High Grantham

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name or mark, the respondent had no legitimate interest, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith. Transfer of the domain name was ordered.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of the domain name to the complainant