Attorney General v. Bennett [2001] UKEAT 0112_01_0205 (2 May 2001)
Mr Bennett has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious proceedings and applications without reasonable grounds, justifying the exercise of discretion to make a restriction of proceedings order under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, with no limitation as to duration.
- Citation
- [2001] UKEAT 0112_01_0205
- Parties
- Applicant: HM Attorney General; Respondent: Mr Stephen Bernard Bennett
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Restriction of Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- restriction of proceedings order granted
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Restriction of Proceedings, Employment Tribunal Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Attorney General
Applicant
Mr Stephen Bernard Bennett
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Restriction of Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Bennett has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious proceedings without reasonable grounds
- 2 Whether a restriction of proceedings order should be made and its duration
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Bennett has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious proceedings and applications without reasonable grounds, justifying the exercise of discretion to make a restriction of proceedings order under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, with no limitation as to duration.
Court Disposition
restriction of proceedings order granted
Orders
- Restriction of proceedings order made against Mr Bennett under section 33 of the Employment Tribunals Act 1996, to remain in force indefinitely.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment