Customs and Excise v. Sawdon [2000] EAT 1296_99_1611 (16 November 2000)
Finality in litigation is not compromised by granting the extension, as the substantive appeal will proceed regardless; this consideration tips the balance in favour of granting the extension.
- Citation
- [2000] EAT 1296_99_1611
- Parties
- Appellant: HM Customs and Excise; Respondent: D. D. Sawdon
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 16 November 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal From Registrar's Order / Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Notice of Appeal
- Outcome
- extension of time granted
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Jurisdiction, Unlawful Wage Deductions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Parties
HM Customs and Excise
Appellant
D. D. Sawdon
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Registrar's Order / Application for Extension of Time to Lodge Notice of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extension of time should be granted for lodging notice of appeal
- 2 Whether sums paid under Home Civil Service Third Party Injury Regulations 1983 constitute wages under section 27 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
Finality in litigation is not compromised by granting the extension, as the substantive appeal will proceed regardless; this consideration tips the balance in favour of granting the extension.
Court Disposition
extension of time granted
Orders
- Time for lodging Notice of Appeal extended until 15 October 1999
- Notice of Appeal received by EAT on 15 October 1999 is validated
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment