Mr A Dutton v HM Reef Acrylic & Ceramic Manufacturing Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2021] UKET 1305771/2020 (24 November 2021)

Mr A Dutton v HM Reef Acrylic & Ceramic Manufacturing Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2021] UKET 1305771/2020 (24 November 2021)

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination had occurred. The respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation for the dismissal, and the claimant failed to prove that age was a factor in the decision.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] UKET 1305771/2020
Parties
Claimant: Mr A Dutton; Respondent: HM Reef Acrylic & Ceramic Manufacturing Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 November 2021
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Unfair Dismissal

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr A Dutton

Claimant

HM Reef Acrylic & Ceramic Manufacturing Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination by the respondent
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination had occurred. The respondent provided a non-discriminatory explanation for the dismissal, and the claimant failed to prove that age was a factor in the decision.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed