Mr B Duffy v HM Revenue and Customs (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Sex Discrimination) [2017] UKET 2202058/2015 (29 March 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish discrimination on the grounds of age or sex under the Equality Act 2010.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2202058/2015
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr B Duffy; Respondent: HM Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 29 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Sex Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr B Duffy
Claimant
HM Revenue and Customs
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of age
- 2 Whether the claimant was discriminated against on the grounds of sex
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish discrimination on the grounds of age or sex under the Equality Act 2010.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment