Mr S Tatu v Hoar Cross Hall Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2020] UKET 2600906/2019 (12 February 2020)

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore was not subjected to detriment for whistleblowing.

Citation: [2020] UKET 2600906/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr S Tatu; Respondent: Hoar Cross Hall Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 12 February 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr S Tatu

Claimant

Hoar Cross Hall Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to detriment for making a protected disclosure under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant did not make a protected disclosure as defined by the Act and therefore was not subjected to detriment for whistleblowing.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed