Remitly U.K., Ltd. v Hofer Jan (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18407 (08 March 2017)

Remitly U.K., Ltd. v Hofer Jan (Full Decision _Transfer) [2017] DRS 18407 (08 March 2017)

The panel found that the complainant had established rights in the mark, the domain name was confusingly similar, the respondent had no legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Citation
[2017] DRS 18407
Parties
Complainant: Remitly U. K., Ltd.; Respondent: Hofer Jan
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
08 March 2017
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint upheld
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Remitly U. K., Ltd.

Complainant

Hofer Jan

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name in dispute is identical or similar to a name or mark in which the complainant has rights
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name
  3. 3 Whether the domain name was registered or is being used in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had established rights in the mark, the domain name was confusingly similar, the respondent had no legitimate interests, and the domain name was registered and used in bad faith.

Court Disposition

Complaint upheld

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.