OA086442013 & OA086462013 [2014] UKAITUR OA086442013 (2 April 2014)
Absent exceptional or compelling circumstances, refusal of entry clearance does not constitute a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights; the First-tier Tribunal erred by not applying this threshold and allowing the appeal solely on proportionality grounds.
- Citation
- [2014] UKAITUR OA086442013
- Parties
- Appellants: Perenbanayagam Selvanayagam & another; Respondent: Home Office
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Immigration Appeal / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Article 8 ECHR, Dependent Relative Visa, Exceptional Circumstances, Proportionality, Immigration Rules
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Perenbanayagam Selvanayagam & another
Appellants
Home Office
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants meet the requirements of the Immigration Rules for dependent relatives
- 2 Whether refusal of entry clearance constitutes a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights absent exceptional or compelling circumstances
Ratio Decidendi
Absent exceptional or compelling circumstances, refusal of entry clearance does not constitute a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights; the First-tier Tribunal erred by not applying this threshold and allowing the appeal solely on proportionality grounds.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Home Office appeal allowed
- Appellants’ appeals dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment