OA086442013 & OA086462013 [2014] UKAITUR OA086442013 (2 April 2014)

OA086442013 & OA086462013 [2014] UKAITUR OA086442013 (2 April 2014)

Absent exceptional or compelling circumstances, refusal of entry clearance does not constitute a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights; the First-tier Tribunal erred by not applying this threshold and allowing the appeal solely on proportionality grounds.

Citation
[2014] UKAITUR OA086442013
Parties
Appellants: Perenbanayagam Selvanayagam & another; Respondent: Home Office
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
02 April 2014
Procedural Posture
Immigration Appeal / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Article 8 ECHR, Dependent Relative Visa, Exceptional Circumstances, Proportionality, Immigration Rules

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Perenbanayagam Selvanayagam & another

Appellants

Home Office

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Immigration Appeal / Appeal From First Tier Tribunal to Upper Tribunal

  1. 1 Whether the appellants meet the requirements of the Immigration Rules for dependent relatives
  2. 2 Whether refusal of entry clearance constitutes a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights absent exceptional or compelling circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

Absent exceptional or compelling circumstances, refusal of entry clearance does not constitute a disproportionate interference with Article 8 rights; the First-tier Tribunal erred by not applying this threshold and allowing the appeal solely on proportionality grounds.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Home Office appeal allowed
  • Appellants’ appeals dismissed