Honeygarth Ltd v Revenue & Customs (VAT - ZERO-RATING : Building work) [2018] UKFTT 567 (TC) (01 October 2018)
Honeygarth Ltd did not have an interest in the land and did not make a supply of the land; therefore, it was not entitled to reclaim input tax. Even if it had made a supply, the supply was not capable of being zero-rated as only foundations had been laid, which does not constitute a building in the course of construction for VAT purposes.
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 567
- Parties
- Appellant: Honeygarth Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 October 2018
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Zero Rating, Input Tax Credit, Construction of Buildings, Land Ownership, Exempt Supply
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Honeygarth Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Honeygarth Ltd had an interest in the land and made a supply of the land
- 2 Whether the supply could be zero-rated for VAT purposes
- 3 Whether Honeygarth Ltd was entitled to reclaim input tax
Ratio Decidendi
Honeygarth Ltd did not have an interest in the land and did not make a supply of the land; therefore, it was not entitled to reclaim input tax. Even if it had made a supply, the supply was not capable of being zero-rated as only foundations had been laid, which does not constitute a building in the course of construction for VAT purposes.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The amounts of input tax disallowed are confirmed in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment