Mr P Rogers v Huws Gray Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2025] UKET 3200096/2024 (30 January 2025)
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination had occurred; the respondent's actions were justified and not related to the claimant's age.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKET 3200096/2024
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr P Rogers; Respondent: Huws Gray Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 January 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr P Rogers
Claimant
Huws Gray Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age in contravention of the Equality Act 2010
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which it could conclude that age discrimination had occurred; the respondent's actions were justified and not related to the claimant's age.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment