Dear v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 111 (TC) (10 March 2010)
The appellant's claim for repayment was made more than three years after the end of the prescribed accounting period, and is therefore barred by s.80(4) VATA 1994. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the assessment or the quantum due to the statutory time bar.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 111 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Ian Dear; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax)
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 March 2010
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Repayment Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, VAT Repayments, Statutory Time Limits, Inflated Assessment Regime
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ian Dear
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (Value Added Tax)
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Repayment Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is entitled to a VAT repayment where the claim was made more than three years after the prescribed period
- 2 Whether s.80(4) Value Added Tax Act 1994 bars the claim
- 3 Whether the assessment was properly made under s.73(8) VATA
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's claim for repayment was made more than three years after the end of the prescribed accounting period, and is therefore barred by s.80(4) VATA 1994. The Tribunal has no jurisdiction to consider the merits of the assessment or the quantum due to the statutory time bar.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment