Online Property Search Ltd v Turnette [2006] DRS 3452 (4 April 2006)
The complainant has rights in the mark ROOST, which is not descriptive of its business. The domain names are similar to the complainant's mark as they consist of ROOST plus a generic place name. The respondent registered the domain names either to block the complainant or disrupt its business, constituting abusive registration. The respondent's failure to respond justifies an adverse inference.
- Citation
- [2006] DRS 3452
- Parties
- Complainant: Online Property Search Limited; Respondent: Ian Turnette
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 April 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint upheld
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Trade Mark Rights, Passing Off, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Online Property Search Limited
Complainant
Ian Turnette
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark similar to the domain names
- 2 Whether the domain names constitute abusive registrations in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant has rights in the mark ROOST, which is not descriptive of its business. The domain names are similar to the complainant's mark as they consist of ROOST plus a generic place name. The respondent registered the domain names either to block the complainant or disrupt its business, constituting abusive registration. The respondent's failure to respond justifies an adverse inference.
Court Disposition
Complaint upheld
Orders
- The domain names are to be transferred to the complainant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment