ASSIMIL v Idah Idah (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 23081 (16 November 2020)

ASSIMIL v Idah Idah (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 23081 (16 November 2020)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting transfer.

Citation
[2020] DRS 23081
Parties
Complainant: ASSIMIL; Respondent: Idah Idah
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
16 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ASSIMIL

Complainant

Idah Idah

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy, warranting transfer.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.