Skyscanner Limited v Idah Idah (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 22435 (23 April 2020)

Skyscanner Limited v Idah Idah (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 22435 (23 April 2020)

The panel found that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive and ordered its transfer to the complainant.

Citation
[2020] DRS 22435
Parties
Complainant: Skyscanner Limited; Respondent: Idah Idah
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
23 April 2020
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Domain name transferred to complainant
Legal Topics
Domain Name Transfer, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Transfer Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Skyscanner Limited

Complainant

Idah Idah

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the respondent constitutes an abusive registration under the Nominet UK Dispute Resolution Service Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive and ordered its transfer to the complainant.

Court Disposition

Domain name transferred to complainant

Orders

  • Transfer of domain name to Skyscanner Limited