Art To LIfe Limited v Identity Protect Limited (Summary Decision _No Action) [2015] DRS 16458 (14 October 2015)

Art To LIfe Limited v Identity Protect Limited (Summary Decision _No Action) [2015] DRS 16458 (14 October 2015)

The Complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2015] DRS 16458
Parties
Complainant: Art To Life Limited; Respondent: Identity Protect Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
14 October 2015
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Marks
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trade Marks

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Art To Life Limited

Complainant

Identity Protect Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the Respondent is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The Complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence to establish that the registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action taken