Fideuram - Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking S.p.A. v Identity Protect Limited (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17005 (07 March 2016)

Fideuram - Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking S.p.A. v Identity Protect Limited (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2016] DRS 17005 (07 March 2016)

The complainant established rights in the name and mark, the domain name was identical or similar, and the respondent had no legitimate interest and registered the domain abusively.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17005
Parties
Complainant: Fideuram - Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking S.p. A.; Respondent: Identity Protect Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
07 March 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Infringement
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Fideuram - Intesa Sanpaolo Private Banking S.p. A.

Complainant

Identity Protect Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The complainant established rights in the name and mark, the domain name was identical or similar, and the respondent had no legitimate interest and registered the domain abusively.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.