Bunzl UK Limited v Identity Protect Limited (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19609 (26 January 2018)

Bunzl UK Limited v Identity Protect Limited (Summary Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 19609 (26 January 2018)

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2018] DRS 19609
Parties
Complainant: Bunzl UK Limited; Respondent: Identity Protect Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
26 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Transfer ordered
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bunzl UK Limited

Complainant

Identity Protect Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant had rights in the name and that the respondent's registration was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Transfer ordered

Orders

  • The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant.