ENSCO 1092 Limited v Identity Protect Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 20762 (09 January 2019)

ENSCO 1092 Limited v Identity Protect Limited (Full Decision _No Action) [2019] DRS 20762 (09 January 2019)

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy.

Citation
[2019] DRS 20762
Parties
Complainant: ENSCO 1092 Limited; Respondent: Identity Protect Limited
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
09 January 2019
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Outcome
Complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trade Mark Rights, Abusive Registration
Intellectual Property Information Technology Domain Name Dispute Trade Mark Rights Abusive Registration

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

ENSCO 1092 Limited

Complainant

Identity Protect Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration under the DRS Policy
  2. 2 Whether the complainant has rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to prove that the domain name was an abusive registration under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint denied

Orders

  • No action to be taken regarding the domain name