Swann-Morton Ltd v Indigo [2008] DRS 5441 (8 April 2008)
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the respondent's use or registration of the domain name was abusive or constituted trade mark infringement; mere ownership or offering for sale, without more, does not establish abuse under the DRS Policy.
- Citation
- [2008] DRS 5441
- Parties
- Complainant: Swann-Morton Ltd; Respondent: Indigo
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 08 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Trade Marks, Domain Name Disputes, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Swann-Morton Ltd
Complainant
Indigo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the domain name identical or similar to its registered trade mark
- 2 Whether the domain name constitutes an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to provide sufficient evidence that the respondent's use or registration of the domain name was abusive or constituted trade mark infringement; mere ownership or offering for sale, without more, does not establish abuse under the DRS Policy.
Court Disposition
Complaint dismissed
Orders
- The domain name should not be transferred.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment