Mr S Smialek v Ingram Micro (UK) Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2020] UKET 3334713/2018 (17 February 2020)

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which the tribunal could conclude that age was a factor in his dismissal, and therefore the claim for age discrimination failed.

Citation: [2020] UKET 3334713/2018
Parties: Claimant: Mr S Smialek; Respondent: Ingram Micro (UK) Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 17 February 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim dismissed
Legal Topics: Age Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal

Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Unfair Dismissal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2

Parties

Mr S Smialek

Claimant

Ingram Micro (UK) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination by the respondent
2 Whether the dismissal of the claimant was unfair

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant had not established facts from which the tribunal could conclude that age was a factor in his dismissal, and therefore the claim for age discrimination failed.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed