Wrigglesworth v Insiteswebdesign [2008] DRS 5536 (24 April 2008)
The complainant established unregistered rights in the name 'Bootham Guest House' but failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an abusive registration as defined by the Policy. There was insufficient evidence of abuse, including lack of evidence of payment for registration or exclusive use by the complainant, and no express or implied case under the relevant Policy provisions.
- Citation
- [2008] DRS 5536
- Parties
- Complainant: Mrs Emma Wrigglesworth; Respondent: insiteswebdesign
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 24 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- Complaint refused
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Abusive Registration, Unregistered Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mrs Emma Wrigglesworth
Complainant
insiteswebdesign
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in the domain name similar or identical to the disputed domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established unregistered rights in the name 'Bootham Guest House' but failed to prove on the balance of probabilities that the domain name was an abusive registration as defined by the Policy. There was insufficient evidence of abuse, including lack of evidence of payment for registration or exclusive use by the complainant, and no express or implied case under the relevant Policy provisions.
Court Disposition
Complaint refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment