Yarlington Housing Group v Inspired To Achieve (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17707 (08 September 2016)

Yarlington Housing Group v Inspired To Achieve (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17707 (08 September 2016)

The adjudicator found that the Complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive or in bad faith under the DRS Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17707
Parties
Complainant: Yarlington Housing Group; Respondent: Inspired To Achieve
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
08 September 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
Complaint dismissed
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Intellectual Property Domain Name Dispute Trademark Infringement

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Yarlington Housing Group

Complainant

Inspired To Achieve

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the domain name registration by the Respondent is abusive or in bad faith

Ratio Decidendi

The adjudicator found that the Complainant failed to prove that the registration was abusive or in bad faith under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

Complaint dismissed

Orders

  • No action taken