Mr G Oluokun v Integral UK Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination) [2023] UKET 2204671/2022 (30 November 2023)
The tribunal found that the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that age was the reason for the alleged less favourable treatment.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] UKET 2204671/2022
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr G Oluokun; Respondent: Integral UK Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Age Discrimination
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr G Oluokun
Claimant
Integral UK Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent discriminated against the claimant on the grounds of age
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to prove that age was the reason for the alleged less favourable treatment.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment