Miss M Burgundy v Interhaze Ltd (England and Wales : Public Interest Disclosure) [2020] UKET 1300417/2020 (9 June 2020)

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment by the respondent because she made a protected disclosure, contrary to Section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Citation: [2020] UKET 1300417/2020
Parties: Claimant: Miss M Burgundy; Respondent: Interhaze Ltd
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 09 June 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Claim upheld
Legal Topics: Public Interest Disclosure, Whistleblowing

Employment Law Public Interest Disclosure Whistleblowing

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Miss M Burgundy

Claimant

Interhaze Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the claimant suffered detriment due to making a protected disclosure under the Employment Rights Act 1996

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that the claimant was subjected to detriment by the respondent because she made a protected disclosure, contrary to Section 47B of the Employment Rights Act 1996.

Court Disposition

Claim upheld

Orders

The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for detriment suffered.