800Contac Ltd & Phonenames Ltd -v- Iris Online Ltd [2004] DRS 1404 (19 February 2004)
The second complainant has rights in the registered trade mark 800 CONTAC, which is similar to the domain name, but has not established rights in the phone name itself. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name was not abusive, as there was no evidence of intent to confuse or unfair advantage, and any confusion arose from complainants' later market entry.
- Citation
- [2004] DRS 1404
- Parties
- Complainant: 800 Contac Limited; Complainant: Phonenames Limited; Respondent: Iris Online Limited
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 19 February 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
- Outcome
- complaint dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name, Trade Mark, Abusive Registration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
800 Contac Limited
Complainant
Phonenames Limited
Complainant
Iris Online Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Expert Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainants have rights in a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name is an abusive registration in the hands of the respondent
Ratio Decidendi
The second complainant has rights in the registered trade mark 800 CONTAC, which is similar to the domain name, but has not established rights in the phone name itself. The respondent's registration and use of the domain name was not abusive, as there was no evidence of intent to confuse or unfair advantage, and any confusion arose from complainants' later market entry.
Court Disposition
complaint dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment