Mr J De Campi and Ms M Devine v ISG Interior Services Group UK Ltd (In Administration) and Secretary of State of Business and Trade (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2025] UKET 2205647/2025 (12 December 2025)

The tribunal found that ISG Interior Services Group UK Ltd failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements, entitling claimants to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2025] UKET 2205647/2025
Parties: Claimant: Mr J De Campi; Claimant: Ms M Devine; Respondent: ISG Interior Services Group UK Ltd (In Administration); Respondent: Secretary of State of Business and Trade
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 12 December 2025
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of claimants
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Collective Redundancy, Consultation Requirements

Employment Law Protective Award Collective Redundancy Consultation Requirements

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr J De Campi

Claimant

Ms M Devine

Claimant

ISG Interior Services Group UK Ltd (In Administration)

Respondent

Secretary of State of Business and Trade

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondent failed to consult employees in accordance with statutory requirements prior to redundancy
2 Entitlement to a protective award under section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992

Ratio Decidendi

The tribunal found that ISG Interior Services Group UK Ltd failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements, entitling claimants to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of claimants

Orders

ISG Interior Services Group UK Ltd to pay protective award to claimants
Secretary of State of Business and Trade to pay statutory compensation if respondent unable to pay

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.