Murray-Smith v Information Commissioner & Anor [2021] UKFTT 2020_0182 (GRC) (03 February 2021)
Some of the information withheld did not engage section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000; as the appellant is content with the released information, no further steps are required.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] UKFTT 2020_0182 (GRC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Ivan Murray-Smith; Respondent: Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: London Borough of Havering
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 February 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Consent Order
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act 2000, Section 40(2) Exemption, Section 21 Exemption, Disclosure of Information
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ivan Murray-Smith
Appellant
Information Commissioner
Respondent
London Borough of Havering
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Consent Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether information withheld engaged section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000
- 2 Whether section 21 exemption was applicable
- 3 Whether released information satisfied appellant
Ratio Decidendi
Some of the information withheld did not engage section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000; as the appellant is content with the released information, no further steps are required.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Decision Notice FS50892255 is substituted to reflect that some withheld information did not engage section 40(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
- London Borough of Havering is not required to take any further steps.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment