Iveco Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2014] UKFTT 451 (TC) (13 May 2014)
There is no requirement under EU law that a claim to enforce a directly-effective right under the Sixth VAT Directive be brought within a reasonable period where no domestic statutory time limit applies.
- Citation
- [2014] UKFTT 451 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Iveco Ltd; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 May 2014
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Repayment Appeal / Decision on Preliminary Issue
- Outcome
- Iveco's claim is not time-barred under EU law; there is no requirement for the claim to be brought within a reasonable period in the absence of a domestic time limit.
- Legal Topics
- VAT Repayments, Directly Effective EU Rights, Limitation Periods, Article 11 C(1) Sixth VAT Directive, Section 80 Value Added Tax Act 1994
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Iveco Ltd
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Repayment Appeal / Decision on Preliminary Issue
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether EU law requires a claim to enforce a directly-effective right under the Sixth VAT Directive to be made within a reasonable period
- 2 Whether the absence of a domestic statutory time limit allows for an EU-imposed reasonable time limit
Ratio Decidendi
There is no requirement under EU law that a claim to enforce a directly-effective right under the Sixth VAT Directive be brought within a reasonable period where no domestic statutory time limit applies.
Court Disposition
Iveco's claim is not time-barred under EU law; there is no requirement for the claim to be brought within a reasonable period in the absence of a domestic time limit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment