Osbourne v Revenue & Customs [2015] UKFTT 3 (TC) (06 January 2015)
The Appellant failed to provide evidence to displace HMRC's figures in closure notices and discovery assessments. Errors in tax returns were due to carelessness, justifying assessments and penalties. The burden of proof was not discharged by the Appellant.
- Citation
- [2015] UKFTT 3
- Parties
- Appellant: Ivor Osbourne; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 06 January 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / Final Judgment at First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed and penalty determination confirmed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Self Assessment, Discovery Assessments, Penalties, Carelessness, Burden of Proof
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ivor Osbourne
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / Final Judgment at First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Appellant has been overcharged in the closure notices
- 2 Whether the assessments are competent as to discovery
- 3 Whether the penalty determinations are correct and appropriate
Ratio Decidendi
The Appellant failed to provide evidence to displace HMRC's figures in closure notices and discovery assessments. Errors in tax returns were due to carelessness, justifying assessments and penalties. The burden of proof was not discharged by the Appellant.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed and penalty determination confirmed.
Orders
- Closure notices and amendments to self-assessments under s 28A TMA for 2001-02, 2002-03, 2003-04 stand.
- Discovery assessments under s 29 TMA for 1997-98, 1998-99, 1999-2000, 2000-01, 2004-05 stand.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment