J Walter Thompson Group Ltd v. Williams [2003] UKEAT 0299_03_1911 (19 November 2003)

J Walter Thompson Group Ltd v. Williams [2003] UKEAT 0299_03_1911 (19 November 2003)

JWT failed to take all reasonable steps to accommodate the respondent's disability, particularly in relation to training and software adaptation. The reasons advanced by JWT for not making further adjustments, including cost and technical uncertainty, were not sufficiently material or substantial, as JWT did not exhaust enquiries or properly assess alternatives. The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that JWT's actions were not justified under the statutory test, and the respondent was constructively and unfairly dismissed.

Citation
[2003] UKEAT 0299_03_1911
Parties
Appellant: J Walter Thompson Group Ltd; Respondent: Sue Williams
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
19 November 2003
Procedural Posture
Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision
Outcome
Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal on section 4(2)(d) also dismissed.
Legal Topics
Reasonable Adjustments, Constructive Dismissal, Direct Discrimination, Justification Defence
Employment Law Disability Discrimination Reasonable Adjustments Constructive Dismissal Direct Discrimination Justification Defence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

J Walter Thompson Group Ltd

Appellant

Sue Williams

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Appeal / Appeal From Employment Tribunal Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether JWT failed to make reasonable adjustments for a disabled employee under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995
  2. 2 Whether JWT constructively and unfairly dismissed the respondent
  3. 3 Whether JWT's actions were justified under the statutory test of materiality and substantiality

Ratio Decidendi

JWT failed to take all reasonable steps to accommodate the respondent's disability, particularly in relation to training and software adaptation. The reasons advanced by JWT for not making further adjustments, including cost and technical uncertainty, were not sufficiently material or substantial, as JWT did not exhaust enquiries or properly assess alternatives. The Employment Tribunal was entitled to find that JWT's actions were not justified under the statutory test, and the respondent was constructively and unfairly dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed; cross-appeal on section 4(2)(d) also dismissed.

Orders

  • Employment Tribunal's decision upheld regarding failure to make reasonable adjustments and constructive dismissal.
  • No finding of discriminatory dismissal under section 4(2)(d) due to constructive dismissal.