Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin v Jack Kozanecki (Full Decision _Transfer) [2018] DRS 20122 (01 June 2018)
The complainant established rights in the trademark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive, with no evidence of legitimate interest or rights by the respondent.
- Citation
- [2018] DRS 20122
- Parties
- Complainant: Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin; Respondent: Jack Kozanecki
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
- Outcome
- Transfer ordered
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Infringement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Compagnie Générale Des Etablissements Michelin
Complainant
Jack Kozanecki
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Full Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name registration is abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy
- 2 Whether the respondent has rights or legitimate interests in the domain name
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant established rights in the trademark and demonstrated that the respondent's registration was abusive, with no evidence of legitimate interest or rights by the respondent.
Court Disposition
Transfer ordered
Orders
- The domain name is to be transferred to the complainant
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment