LGB Alliance v James Billingham (Full Decision _Transfer) [2020] DRS 22121 (18 March 2020)
The Panel found that the Respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive as it prevented the Complainant from reflecting its name in a corresponding domain name and the Respondent had no legitimate interests in the domain name.
- Citation
- [2020] DRS 22121
- Parties
- Complainant: LGB Alliance; Respondent: James Billingham
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
- Outcome
- Domain name transferred to Complainant
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Transfer, Passing Off
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
LGB Alliance
Complainant
James Billingham
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Final Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the domain name lgballiance.org.uk should be transferred to the Complainant
- 2 Whether the Respondent's registration constitutes abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The Panel found that the Respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive as it prevented the Complainant from reflecting its name in a corresponding domain name and the Respondent had no legitimate interests in the domain name.
Court Disposition
Domain name transferred to Complainant
Orders
- Transfer of lgballiance.org.uk to LGB Alliance
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment