Hall v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - STRIKE OUT) [2026] UKFTT 124 (TC) (13 January 2026)
A Joint and Several Liability Notice under Schedule 13 Finance Act 2020 constitutes a criminal charge for Article 6 ECHR purposes. Accordingly, HMRC bears the burden of proving the statutory conditions for issuing and maintaining a JSLN. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider public law arguments, including...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] UKFTT 124
- Parties
- Appellant: James Hall; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 13 January 2026
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Interlocutory Applications—burden of Proof and Strike Out
- Outcome
- Appellant's application to amend directions allowed; HMRC's strike out applications refused.
- Legal Topics
- Joint and Several Liability Notice (jsln), Burden of Proof, Article 6 ECHR (right to Fair Trial), Article 1 Protocol 1 ECHR (property Rights), Proportionality, Irrationality, Tribunal Jurisdiction, Strike Out Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
James Hall
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Interlocutory Applications—burden of Proof and Strike Out
Legal Issues
- 1 Is a Joint and Several Liability Notice (JSLN) a criminal charge for Article 6 ECHR purposes?
- 2 Who bears the burden of proof in an appeal against a JSLN?
- 3 Does the Tribunal have jurisdiction to hear public law arguments (proportionality, irrationality, breach of guidance) in JSLN appeals?
Ratio Decidendi
A Joint and Several Liability Notice under Schedule 13 Finance Act 2020 constitutes a criminal charge for Article 6 ECHR purposes. Accordingly, HMRC bears the burden of proving the statutory conditions for issuing and maintaining a JSLN. The Tribunal has jurisdiction to consider public law arguments, including proportionality and irrationality, in JSLN appeals. Grounds alleging irrationality and breach of guidance are arguable and should not be struck out at this stage.
Court Disposition
Appellant's application to amend directions allowed; HMRC's strike out applications refused.
Orders
- Directions amended: HMRC to serve witness evidence and skeleton argument first.
- HMRC's application to strike out grounds 3–5 for want of jurisdiction refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment