Mr E Berkolds and 26 others see schedule v Jamie-™s Italian Ltd (in Administration) and The Secretary of State for BEIS (England and Wales : Protective Award) [2020] UKET 2411010/2019 (30 December 2020)

The Tribunal found that Jamie's Italian Ltd failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements prior to making redundancies and that the claimants were entitled to a protective award.

Source-derived case information.

Citation: [2020] UKET 2411010/2019
Parties: Claimant: Mr E Berkolds and 26 others; Respondent: Jamie's Italian Ltd (in Administration); Respondent: The Secretary of State for BEIS
Jurisdiction: United Kingdom
Judgment Date: 30 December 2020
Procedural Posture: Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Outcome: Protective award granted in favour of the claimants
Legal Topics: Protective Award, Redundancy, Collective Consultation

Employment Law Protective Award Redundancy Collective Consultation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Parties

Mr E Berkolds and 26 others

Claimant

Jamie's Italian Ltd (in Administration)

Respondent

The Secretary of State for BEIS

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether the respondents failed to comply with statutory consultation requirements prior to redundancy
2 Whether a protective award should be made to the claimants

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Jamie's Italian Ltd failed to comply with the statutory consultation requirements prior to making redundancies and that the claimants were entitled to a protective award.

Court Disposition

Protective award granted in favour of the claimants

Orders

Respondent Jamie's Italian Ltd to pay a protective award to the claimants for the maximum period permitted by law

About this LexChat collection

Publisher and coverage

LexChat is published by Esheria. Coverage reflects the case law currently mapped from identified source collections; it may be incomplete, delayed, or later corrected. The official source controls where it differs from this research page.

AI and research method

Source-derived facts are shown separately from AI-generated material. If an AI summary is available, it is explicitly labelled and remains a non-authoritative research aid.

Corrections and reporting

Report a source mismatch, factual issue, personal-data concern, or licensing question to support@esheria.co.ke. Include this page's URL and the supporting official source so the record can be reviewed, corrected, restricted, or withdrawn.

Legal-information disclaimer

LexChat provides legal information and research tools, not legal advice. Verify currency, status, citations, and jurisdiction with authoritative sources and a qualified professional where appropriate.