Addo v Revenue & Customs (PROCEDURE : Other) [2018] UKFTT 530 (TC) (03 September 2018)
The Tribunal held that the default disclosure obligation under rule 27 is limited to documents a party intends to rely on, but the Tribunal has discretion under rules 5(3) and 16 to order disclosure of relevant documents to deal with the case fairly and justly. The Tribunal found that some of the requested documents were relevant and referred to in HMRC's witness statement, and that fairness required their disclosure, subject to redaction for third-party confidentiality. However, the Tribunal accepted that disclosure of certain categories of documents would be disproportionate or unnecessary, given their limited relevance to the appellant's case and the sensitivity of HMRC's internal...
- Citation
- [2018] UKFTT 530 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Janet Addo; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 September 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Specific Disclosure in Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Application Prior to Substantive Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for specific disclosure granted in part.
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure of Documents, Tribunal Procedure, Discovery Assessments, Burden of Proof, Relevance and Proportionality in Disclosure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Janet Addo
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Specific Disclosure in Tax Appeal / Interlocutory Application Prior to Substantive Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC must disclose internal documents referred to in a witness statement but not relied upon at hearing
- 2 Whether the Tribunal should exercise its discretion to order disclosure under rules 5(3), 16 and 27(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Tax Chamber) Rules 2009
- 3 Whether sensitivity or confidentiality of HMRC internal documents justifies refusal of disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that the default disclosure obligation under rule 27 is limited to documents a party intends to rely on, but the Tribunal has discretion under rules 5(3) and 16 to order disclosure of relevant documents to deal with the case fairly and justly. The Tribunal found that some of the requested documents were relevant and referred to in HMRC's witness statement, and that fairness required their disclosure, subject to redaction for third-party confidentiality. However, the Tribunal accepted that disclosure of certain categories of documents would be disproportionate or unnecessary, given their limited relevance to the appellant's case and the sensitivity of HMRC's internal...
Court Disposition
Application for specific disclosure granted in part.
Orders
- HMRC to disclose certain documents referred to in Mr Finch’s witness statement, subject to redaction for third-party confidentiality.
- Disclosure of other categories of documents refused on grounds of proportionality and limited relevance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment