Mr A Rush v JD Wetherspoon plc (England and Wales : Unfair Dismissal) [2021] UKET 3303984/2020 (4 March 2021)
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to demonstrate a fair reason for dismissal and did not follow a reasonable procedure, rendering the dismissal unfair.
- Citation
- [2021] UKET 3303984/2020
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr A Rush; Respondent: JD Wetherspoon plc
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 04 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim upheld
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Mr A Rush
Claimant
JD Wetherspoon plc
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed under the Employment Rights Act 1996
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the respondent failed to demonstrate a fair reason for dismissal and did not follow a reasonable procedure, rendering the dismissal unfair.
Court Disposition
Claim upheld
Orders
- The respondent is ordered to pay compensation to the claimant for unfair dismissal
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment