JD Wetherspoon PLC v Revenue and Customs (application of reduced rate to supplies of cider in the course of restaurant and catering services - whether cider fell within the exclusion) [2025] UKFTT 658 (TC) (03 June 2025)
The Tribunal held that, on a strict construction, the statutory language of Group 14 did not include cider within the definition of 'alcoholic beverage.' However, the conditions for applying the Inco principle were satisfied: there was an obvious drafting error, the legislative intent was clear from the context and materials, and the correction was necessary to give effect to that intent. Therefore, cider should be read into the definition, meaning it was excluded from the reduced rate. Even if the Inco principle did not apply, the exclusion of cider from the definition would breach EU law and the principle of fiscal neutrality, requiring a conforming interpretation to the same effect....
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 658 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: JD Wetherspoon PLC; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 03 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Preliminary Issue Determination
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Value Added Tax, Reduced Rate Application, Alcoholic Beverages Definition, Statutory Construction, EU Fiscal Neutrality
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
JD Wetherspoon PLC
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Appeal (first Tier Tribunal, Tax Chamber) / Preliminary Issue Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether cider falls within the exclusion from the reduced rate of alcoholic beverages in Group 14 of Schedule 7A to the Value Added Tax Act 1994;
- 2 Whether the Inco principle for correcting obvious errors in legislation applies to insert cider into the definition;
- 3 Whether, absent the Inco principle, the exclusion of cider from the definition is compatible with paragraph (12a) of Annex III of Directive 2006/112/EC and the EU principle of fiscal neutrality.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that, on a strict construction, the statutory language of Group 14 did not include cider within the definition of 'alcoholic beverage.' However, the conditions for applying the Inco principle were satisfied: there was an obvious drafting error, the legislative intent was clear from the context and materials, and the correction was necessary to give effect to that intent. Therefore, cider should be read into the definition, meaning it was excluded from the reduced rate. Even if the Inco principle did not apply, the exclusion of cider from the definition would breach EU law and the principle of fiscal neutrality, requiring a conforming interpretation to the same effect....
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- Cider is to be treated as excluded from the reduced rate of VAT for the relevant period under Group 14 of Schedule 7A to the Value Added Tax Act 1994.
- No repayment of VAT is due to the Appellant in respect of supplies of cider during the relevant period.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment