Jeffries & Sons v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (VAT - application to bring late appeal - Martland considered - claim for overpaid VAT on gaming machine takings - HMRC made protective assessment in the context of the Rank Group litigation - effect of wording of protective assessment) [2024] UKFTT 1031 (TC) (14 November 2024)
Permission to bring a late appeal was refused because the delay of over nine years was serious and significant, and while there was initially a good reason for not appealing (confusion caused by HMRC's correspondence and the existence of a prior appeal), this reason ceased to apply in 2016 when the prior appeal was withdrawn. There was no good reason for the entire period of delay, and the need to respect statutory time limits outweighed the appellant's strong underlying case and the limited prejudice to HMRC.
- Citation
- [2024] UKFTT 1031
- Parties
- Appellant: Jeffries & Sons; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Late Appeal Application / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Application for Permission to Bring Late Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to bring a late appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Late Appeal, Protective Assessment, Statutory Time Limits, Rank Group Litigation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeffries & Sons
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Late Appeal Application / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Application for Permission to Bring Late Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to bring a late appeal against a VAT protective assessment issued in 2013, more than nine years out of time.
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to bring a late appeal was refused because the delay of over nine years was serious and significant, and while there was initially a good reason for not appealing (confusion caused by HMRC's correspondence and the existence of a prior appeal), this reason ceased to apply in 2016 when the prior appeal was withdrawn. There was no good reason for the entire period of delay, and the need to respect statutory time limits outweighed the appellant's strong underlying case and the limited prejudice to HMRC.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to bring a late appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment