Jeffries & Sons v Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs (VAT - application to bring late appeal - Martland considered - claim for overpaid VAT on gaming machine takings - HMRC made protective assessment in the context of the Rank Group litigation - effect of wording of protective assessment) [2024] UKFTT 1031 (TC) (14 November 2024)
Permission to bring a late appeal was refused because, although the appellant initially had a good reason for not appealing the protective assessment in time due to confusion from HMRC's correspondence and the existence of a prior appeal, this reason ceased when the appellant withdrew their earlier appeal in 2016. The subsequent delay of over six years was unjustified. The need to respect statutory time limits outweighed the appellant's strong underlying case and the limited prejudice to HMRC.
- Citation
- [2024] UKFTT 1031 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jeffries & Sons; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2024
- Procedural Posture
- VAT Late Appeal Application / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Application for Permission to Bring Late Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for permission to bring a late appeal refused.
- Legal Topics
- VAT, Late Appeals, Protective Assessments, Gaming Machine Takings, Statutory Time Limits
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeffries & Sons
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
VAT Late Appeal Application / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Application for Permission to Bring Late Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether permission should be granted to bring a late appeal against a VAT protective assessment issued in 2013, more than nine years after the statutory time limit expired.
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to bring a late appeal was refused because, although the appellant initially had a good reason for not appealing the protective assessment in time due to confusion from HMRC's correspondence and the existence of a prior appeal, this reason ceased when the appellant withdrew their earlier appeal in 2016. The subsequent delay of over six years was unjustified. The need to respect statutory time limits outweighed the appellant's strong underlying case and the limited prejudice to HMRC.
Court Disposition
Application for permission to bring a late appeal refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment