Andrea Brady v Jepsons Ltd and Andrew Chell (England and Wales : Breach of Contract : Disability Discrimination : Parental and Maternity Leave : Sex Discrimination : Unfair Dismissal : Unlawful Deduction from Wages : Written Pay Statement) [2017] UKET 2400427/2016 (14 March 2017)
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to unlawful deduction from wages, but did not uphold the claims of disability discrimination, sex discrimination, breach of contract, or failure to provide a written pay statement.
- Citation
- [2017] UKET 2400427/2016
- Parties
- Claimant: Andrea Brady; Respondent: Jepsons Ltd; Respondent: Andrew Chell
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Employment Tribunal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Partially upheld
- Legal Topics
- Breach of Contract, Disability Discrimination, Parental and Maternity Leave, Sex Discrimination, Unfair Dismissal, Unlawful Deduction From Wages, Written Pay Statement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Andrea Brady
Claimant
Jepsons Ltd
Respondent
Andrew Chell
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant was unfairly dismissed
- 2 Whether there was disability discrimination
- 3 Whether there was sex discrimination
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal found that the claimant was unfairly dismissed and subjected to unlawful deduction from wages, but did not uphold the claims of disability discrimination, sex discrimination, breach of contract, or failure to provide a written pay statement.
Court Disposition
Partially upheld
Orders
- The claimant is awarded compensation for unfair dismissal.
- The claimant is awarded compensation for unlawful deduction from wages.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment