Priestley v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - case management - appeal against a final closure notice - HMRC application to strike out - HMRC application for a direction that the appellant amends his grounds of appeal - appellant's application for specific disclosure) [2025] UKFTT 876 (TC) (18 July 2025)
The tribunal has jurisdiction because the appellant's challenge is to the amendments made by the closure notices and tax calculations, not merely the self-assessment account balance. However, the appellant must amend his grounds of appeal to set out the legal and factual basis of his challenge in sufficient detail....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 876
- Parties
- Appellant: Jeremy Priestley; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal / Case Management Decision on Interlocutory Applications
- Outcome
- HMRC's strike out application dismissed; HMRC's application for amended grounds of appeal granted; appellant's disclosure application dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Closure Notices, Appeal Jurisdiction, Case Management, Disclosure, Strike Out
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeremy Priestley
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal / Case Management Decision on Interlocutory Applications
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction over the appellant's appeal against closure notices and associated tax calculations
- 2 Whether the appellant must amend and particularise his grounds of appeal
- 3 Whether HMRC must provide specific disclosure of documents and information relating to tax liability calculations
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal has jurisdiction because the appellant's challenge is to the amendments made by the closure notices and tax calculations, not merely the self-assessment account balance. However, the appellant must amend his grounds of appeal to set out the legal and factual basis of his challenge in sufficient detail. The disclosure application is rejected as the onus is on the appellant to particularise his case, and the tribunal has no jurisdiction over the self-assessment statements.
Court Disposition
HMRC's strike out application dismissed; HMRC's application for amended grounds of appeal granted; appellant's disclosure application dismissed.
Orders
- Appellant to file and serve amended grounds of appeal within 60 days detailing legal and factual grounds relied upon.
- HMRC's requirement to provide a statement of case is stayed until 60 days after appellant's compliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment