Priestley v Revenue and Customs (INCOME TAX - case management - appeal against a final closure notice - HMRC application to strike out - HMRC application for a direction that the appellant amends his grounds of appeal - appellant's application for specific disclosure) [2025] UKFTT 876 (TC) (18 July 2025)
The tribunal has jurisdiction because the appeal is against amendments made by closure notices and tax calculations, not merely the self-assessment statements. The appellant must amend his grounds of appeal to provide sufficient legal and factual detail. HMRC is not required to provide further disclosure at this...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 876 (TC)
- Parties
- Appellant: Jeremy Priestley; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 18 July 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Income Tax Appeal (case Management Decision) / Interlocutory (applications to Strike Out, Amend Grounds, and for Disclosure)
- Outcome
- HMRC's strike out and disclosure applications dismissed; HMRC's application for further and better particulars granted.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Closure Notices, Appeals Procedure, Jurisdiction, Case Management, Disclosure, Strike Out Applications
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jeremy Priestley
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Income Tax Appeal (case Management Decision) / Interlocutory (applications to Strike Out, Amend Grounds, and for Disclosure)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the tribunal has jurisdiction over the appeal against closure notices and associated tax calculations
- 2 Whether the appellant's grounds of appeal are sufficiently particularised
- 3 Whether HMRC must provide further disclosure
Ratio Decidendi
The tribunal has jurisdiction because the appeal is against amendments made by closure notices and tax calculations, not merely the self-assessment statements. The appellant must amend his grounds of appeal to provide sufficient legal and factual detail. HMRC is not required to provide further disclosure at this stage. The strike out and disclosure applications are dismissed; the application for further and better particulars is granted.
Court Disposition
HMRC's strike out and disclosure applications dismissed; HMRC's application for further and better particulars granted.
Orders
- Appellant to file amended grounds of appeal within 60 days detailing legal and factual grounds relied upon.
- HMRC's obligation to provide a statement of case is stayed until 60 days after appellant's compliance.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment