Mr D Naique v Jessica Saunders and Gibson Hollyhomes Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Race Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2017] UKET 1800392/2017 (2 October 2017)

Mr D Naique v Jessica Saunders and Gibson Hollyhomes Ltd (England and Wales : Age Discrimination : Race Discrimination : Religion or Belief Discrimination) [2017] UKET 1800392/2017 (2 October 2017)

The Tribunal found that the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that he was subjected to discrimination on the grounds of age, race, or religion or belief. The respondents' actions were found to be lawful and non-discriminatory.

Citation
[2017] UKET 1800392/2017
Parties
Claimant: Mr D Naique; Respondent: Jessica Saunders; Respondent: Gibson Hollyhomes Ltd
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
02 October 2017
Procedural Posture
Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Claim dismissed
Legal Topics
Age Discrimination, Race Discrimination, Religion or Belief Discrimination
Employment Law Equality Law Age Discrimination Race Discrimination Religion or Belief Discrimination

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mr D Naique

Claimant

Jessica Saunders

Respondent

Gibson Hollyhomes Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Tribunal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the claimant was subjected to age discrimination
  2. 2 Whether the claimant was subjected to race discrimination
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was subjected to religion or belief discrimination

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the claimant did not provide sufficient evidence to establish that he was subjected to discrimination on the grounds of age, race, or religion or belief. The respondents' actions were found to be lawful and non-discriminatory.

Court Disposition

Claim dismissed