Wing And A Prayer Hen Rescue SCIO v Joanne Drysdale (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17919 (24 October 2016)

Wing And A Prayer Hen Rescue SCIO v Joanne Drysdale (Summary Decision _No Action) [2016] DRS 17919 (24 October 2016)

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2016] DRS 17919
Parties
Complainant: Wing And A Prayer Hen Rescue SCIO; Respondent: Joanne Drysdale
Jurisdiction
United Kingdom
Judgment Date
24 October 2016
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision
Outcome
complaint denied
Legal Topics
Domain Name Dispute, Trademark Rights, Bad Faith Registration
Intellectual Property Internet Law Domain Name Dispute Trademark Rights Bad Faith Registration

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Wing And A Prayer Hen Rescue SCIO

Complainant

Joanne Drysdale

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Domain Name Dispute / Summary Decision

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the respondent's registration of the disputed domain name was abusive under the Nominet DRS Policy

Ratio Decidendi

The panel found that the complainant failed to establish that the respondent's registration of the domain name was abusive under the DRS Policy.

Court Disposition

complaint denied

Orders

  • no action