Boyle v Revenue and Customs (EXCISE DUTY APPEALS : Other) [2016] UKFTT 566 (TC) (10 August 2016)
The appellant, through his involvement in a conspiracy to evade duty and by knowingly allowing his premises and trailer to be used for storing duty-unpaid cigarettes, was 'involved in the holding' of the goods under regulation 10(2) of the 2010 Regulations and is therefore liable for the duty. The assessment was made within the statutory time limit, as the last material evidence justifying the assessment was received on 9 January 2014.
- Citation
- [2016] UKFTT 566
- Parties
- Appellant: John Boyle; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 10 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Excise Duty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Excise Duty, Liability for Unpaid Duty, Duty Point, Holding of Excise Goods, Time Limits for Assessment
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Boyle
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Excise Duty Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax Chamber) Substantive Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant is liable for excise duty on seized cigarettes under the Excise Goods (Holding, Movement and Duty Point) Regulations 2010
- 2 Whether the assessment was made within the statutory time limit under s 12(4) of the Finance Act 1994
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant, through his involvement in a conspiracy to evade duty and by knowingly allowing his premises and trailer to be used for storing duty-unpaid cigarettes, was 'involved in the holding' of the goods under regulation 10(2) of the 2010 Regulations and is therefore liable for the duty. The assessment was made within the statutory time limit, as the last material evidence justifying the assessment was received on 9 January 2014.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- The assessment for excise duty in the sum of £25,540 is upheld against the appellant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment