Agnew v Revenue & Customs [2010] UKFTT 272 (TC) (14 June 2010)
The appellant did not carry on a trade at any relevant time; if he did, it was not on a commercial basis or with a view to profit, so no losses are eligible for relief. The assessment for 2003-04 must be discharged as HMRC was already aware of the relevant facts, but assessments for subsequent years are upheld as HMRC was not so aware.
- Citation
- [2010] UKFTT 272
- Parties
- Appellant: John Cree Locke Agnew; Respondents: The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 14 June 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; dismissed in part.
- Legal Topics
- Income Tax, Corporation Tax, Loss Relief, Discovery Assessments, Commercial Basis of Trade
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Cree Locke Agnew
Appellant
The Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Tax Appeal / First Tier Tribunal (tax) Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant was carrying on a trade
- 2 Whether any such trade was carried on on a commercial basis or was commercial within the meaning of the relevant statutes
- 3 Whether HMRC was barred from raising discovery assessments due to information previously supplied
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant did not carry on a trade at any relevant time; if he did, it was not on a commercial basis or with a view to profit, so no losses are eligible for relief. The assessment for 2003-04 must be discharged as HMRC was already aware of the relevant facts, but assessments for subsequent years are upheld as HMRC was not so aware.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; dismissed in part.
Orders
- Assessment for 2003-04 discharged.
- Assessments for 2004-05, 2005-06, and amendments for 2006-07, 2007-08, and 2008-09 upheld.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment