Crooks v Revenue and Customs (PROCEDURE - application for a direction that HMRC provide further and better particulars and disclosure of documents in relation to discounted settlement opportunities for large companies involving Employee Benefit Trusts) [2025] UKFTT 1148 (TC) (30 September 2025)
The application was refused because the requested disclosure and particulars were not relevant or proportionate to the issues in dispute, the pleadings were incomplete, and the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to direct disclosure regarding settlement terms offered to third parties. The application was premature and outside the Tribunal's statutory remit.
- Citation
- [2025] UKFTT 1148
- Parties
- Appellant: John Crooks; Respondents: The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 September 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Further and Better Particulars and Disclosure / Interlocutory Application Prior to Completion of Pleadings
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- Disclosure, Employee Benefit Trusts, Settlement Offers, Jurisdiction of Tribunal, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
John Crooks
Appellant
The Commissioners for His Majesty's Revenue and Customs
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Application for Further and Better Particulars and Disclosure / Interlocutory Application Prior to Completion of Pleadings
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether HMRC should be directed to provide further and better particulars and disclosure regarding discounted settlement opportunities for large companies involving Employee Benefit Trusts in 2015
- 2 Whether such disclosure is relevant and proportionate to the issues in dispute in the appeal
- 3 Whether the Tribunal has jurisdiction to direct disclosure relating to settlement terms offered to third parties
Ratio Decidendi
The application was refused because the requested disclosure and particulars were not relevant or proportionate to the issues in dispute, the pleadings were incomplete, and the Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to direct disclosure regarding settlement terms offered to third parties. The application was premature and outside the Tribunal's statutory remit.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- The Appellant's application for a direction that HMRC provide further and better particulars and for disclosure of documents is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment