British Critical Incident Stress Foundation -v- Durkin [2002] DRS 490 (30 August 2002)
The complainant failed to establish rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name as required by the Policy, as the relevant date for establishing such rights predated the complainant's formal establishment and the Letter of Understanding. The existence of a confidential relationship did not create a right in relation to a name or mark under the Policy.
- Citation
- [2002] DRS 490
- Parties
- Complainant: British Critical Incident Stress Foundation; Respondent: John Durkin
- Jurisdiction
- United Kingdom
- Judgment Date
- 30 August 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
- Outcome
- complaint refused
- Legal Topics
- Domain Name Disputes, Passing Off, Confidential Information
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
British Critical Incident Stress Foundation
Complainant
John Durkin
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Domain Name Dispute / Decision of Independent Expert
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the complainant has rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name
- 2 Whether the domain name in the hands of the respondent is an abusive registration
Ratio Decidendi
The complainant failed to establish rights in respect of a name or mark identical or similar to the domain name as required by the Policy, as the relevant date for establishing such rights predated the complainant's formal establishment and the Letter of Understanding. The existence of a confidential relationship did not create a right in relation to a name or mark under the Policy.
Court Disposition
complaint refused
Orders
- The complaint in respect of the domain name bcisf.org.uk is refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment